343
Showing all 4 results
-
Illuminate ways to reduce utility bills with a lighting upgrade
Winter 2013
Newsletter: Manufacturer
Price: $225.00, Subscriber Price: $157.50
Word count: 343
Abstract: Manufacturers who have been considering upgrading their plant’s T12 fluorescent lights need to act soon. The U.S. Department of Energy pulled the plug last year on production of most T12 bulbs and ballasts — the most widely used fluorescent unit for the past 60 years. Another option is to invest in newer, energy-efficient T5 and T8 fluorescents. There are the up-front costs, but this article offers ways to offset them.
-
Estate Planning Red Flag — You haven’t recently reviewed your retirement plan beneficiary designations
September / October 2012
Newsletter: Estate Planner
Price: $225.00, Subscriber Price: $157.50
Word count: 343
Abstract: No matter how carefully one plans their estate, their objectives can easily be thwarted by inappropriate beneficiary designations for IRAs, 401(k) plans or other retirement accounts. This article lists some of the most common mistakes, such as designating one’s estate as beneficiary or not updating beneficiary designations after a divorce.
-
Enhance your estate planning with a joint purchase
October / November 2008
Newsletter: Focus
Price: $225.00, Subscriber Price: $157.50
Word count: 343
Abstract: Estate planning tools can range from simple to mind-numbingly complex. While a sophisticated strategy is often the best way to accomplish your objectives, in some cases the simplest technique can be powerfully effective. This brief article discusses the joint purchase of a home, a relatively simple estate planning tool that can help you achieve significant tax savings.
-
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company v. Ditocco Konstruction, Inc. – Subrogation waiver extends to postconstruction losses
September / October 2008
Newsletter: Construction Law Briefing
Price: $225.00, Subscriber Price: $157.50
Word count: 343
Abstract: In this issue’s CLB Quickcase, we look at a timely New Jersey case that decided whether the waiver of a subrogation clause contained in the standard AIA construction contract extended to losses that occurred after the project in question was completed.