Punitive damages require malice or reckless indifference
$225.00
Description
Abstract: The Sixth Circuit ruled that an employer wasn’t off the hook for punitive damages for sexual harassment, even though it claimed that it hadn’t acted with the requisite malice or reckless indifference. This article explains why the court reinstated a jury’s $75,000 punitive-damages reward to an employee. Parker v. General Extrusions Inc., 491 F.3d 596 (6th Cir. 2007)
Additional information
| Year | |
|---|---|
| Niche | |
| Newsletter | |
| Issue | |
| Word Count |