Daubert calls for liberal admission of expert testimony
$225.00
Description
Abstract: In recent years, federal district courts have become increasingly aggressive in excluding expert testimony — both scientific and financial — on Daubert grounds. But this article summarizes two recent decisions in which courts clarified that the standards for admission of expert testimony are liberal ones. City of Pomona v. SQM North America, Nos. 12-55147 and 12-55193 (9th Cir. 5/2/14) Johnson v. Mead Johnson & Company, Nos. 13-1685 and 13-22681 (8th Cir. 6/6/14)
Additional information
| Year | |
|---|---|
| Niche | |
| Newsletter | Valuation & Litigation Briefing / Litigation & Valuation Report |
| Issue | |
| Word Count |