Court rejects “apples-to-oranges” valuation analysis as unreliable
$225.00
Description
Abstract: The claim that a business valuation expert is making flawed comparisons can be devastating to the expert’s credibility and the client’s case. This article summarizes a recent Delaware Chancery Court decision to reject a damage calculation in its entirety, because the expert made an “apples-to-oranges” comparison. Dieckman v. Regency GP LP, C.A. No. 11130-CB (Del. Ch. 2021).
Additional information
| Year | |
|---|---|
| Niche | |
| Newsletter | Valuation & Litigation Briefing / Litigation & Valuation Report |
| Issue | |
| Word Count |