Barking up the wrong tree: A trademark case
$225.00
Description
Abstract: The owner of a trademark for pet food and treats took issue when a competitor tried to register a similar mark for its own products. The article explains why an appeals court concluded that the marks were sufficiently similar in their overall commercial impression to deny registration. It explains that the court focused on three of 13 “DuPont” factors in reaching its conclusion. Citation: Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., No. 2011-1482, July 9, 2012 (Fed. Cir.)
Additional information
| Year | |
|---|---|
| Niche | |
| Newsletter | |
| Issue | |
| Word Count |