Quick! Act fast when sexual harassment is alleged
$225.00
Description
Abstract: When a retailer learned that one of its store managers had sexually harassed three employees, it terminated the manager. But did it act quickly enough to avoid violating the employees’ rights under Title VII? This article looks at the facts of the case and the Sixth Circuit’s ruling. A sidebar describes a similar sexual harassment case with a different outcome. EEOC v. AutoZone, Inc., No. 16-6387, June 9, 2017 (6th Cir.) Dillon v. Ned Mgmt., No. 13-cv-2622, February 2, 2015 (E.D.N.Y.)
Additional information
Year | |
---|---|
Niche | |
Newsletter | |
Issue | |
Word Count |