Magarik v. Kraus USA, Inc. – Bad assumptions sink expert’s plumbing business valuation

Description

Abstract: Courts expect valuation experts to base their analyses on sound data and realistic assumptions. If they fail to do so, courts may disregard all or part of their conclusions. This article summarizes a recent statutory appraisal case from New York that highlights the importance of using reliable inputs when valuing a business. A sidebar explains why courts usually prefer objective, market-based valuation inputs over internally generated assumptions. Magarik v. Kraus USA, Inc., No. 606128-15 (Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., April 28, 2020).