article_search

Search Articles:

Product Finder

Search for products that match of these criteria:

 + Add row
Price:

Just desserts? Why a computerized menu patent was found ineligible

$225.00

SKU: IIPjj171. Category: .

Description

Abstract: This article talks about why merely appending a pre-existing practice or technology to patent-ineligible claims doesn’t render them patent-eligible. Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc. involved patents for a computerized restaurant menu system that were challenged for adding familiar computer components to well-known business practices. A sidebar explains what a “Covered Business Method” patent is. Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc., No. 2015-1703, -1704, Nov. 29, 2016 (Fed. Cir.) Alice Corp Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, No. 13–298, June 19, 2014 (U.S.)

Additional information

Year

Niche

Newsletter

Issue

Word Count