Just desserts? Why a computerized menu patent was found ineligible
$225.00
Description
Abstract: This article talks about why merely appending a pre-existing practice or technology to patent-ineligible claims doesn’t render them patent-eligible. Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc. involved patents for a computerized restaurant menu system that were challenged for adding familiar computer components to well-known business practices. A sidebar explains what a “Covered Business Method” patent is. Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc., No. 2015-1703, -1704, Nov. 29, 2016 (Fed. Cir.) Alice Corp Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, No. 13–298, June 19, 2014 (U.S.)
Additional information
Year | |
---|---|
Niche | |
Newsletter | |
Issue | |
Word Count |