Disciplinary consistency: A Title VII case
$225.00
Description
Abstract: When a white casino worker was terminated for mishandling playing cards, she noted that six other supervisors had engaged in similar misconduct — but only two had been terminated. She sued the casino, alleging gender and race discrimination in violation of Title VII. This article shows how the Sixth Circuit used a “mixed-motive analysis” in finding for the plaintiff. Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit, No. 10-2133, August 8, 2012 (6th Cir.)
Additional information
| Year | |
|---|---|
| Niche | |
| Newsletter | |
| Issue | |
| Word Count |