Coffee break: Court lowers bar for dilution claims
$225.00
Description
Abstract: When Starbucks sued a company selling “Charbucks” coffee, a district court found that the two marks had not been blurred, largely because the marks weren’t substantially similar. But an appeals court maintained that the degree of similarity between the marks was just one of six nonexclusive factors that should be considered when evaluating blurring claims.
Additional information
Year | |
---|---|
Niche | |
Newsletter | |
Issue | |
Word Count |